Page 4 of 5

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:39 pm
by snowingagain
Until quite recently it was believed that embryos at about 6 or 7 weeks were default female. That is, that n the absence of genes to start the bioligical process of developing testis etc, the embryo was default female. Research has now proved that incorrect: developing the female structures from the undifferentiated bits also requires an active process. So, we all start off, when we are teeny tiny, with undifferentiated sex organs. Active processes then happen that set one or the other in motion. Our sex is determined at conception. Which is why you can have sex typing of tiny embryos in order to select to select to avoid a nasty sex-linked diseases. There are obviously rare chromosomal cock ups, that produce anomalies. Though even most if not all of them, you can determine the sex of the person the anomaly has happened to.

This does not have anything to do with people feeling feminine, or masculine or neither. That is fine, but something else.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:39 pm
by snowingagain
PS I am not a Trump fan. LOL

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:46 pm
by snowingagain
Sorry for typos. Writing on tiny device, even with 2 pairs of reading glasses am finding it tricky.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:52 pm
by Krieg
The info is appreciated.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:57 pm
by Fraufruit

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:38 pm
by yesterday
It seems hard to determine the small babies sex, until after 6 or 7 weeks, and maybe as long as 11 weeks.

See here https://www.whattoexpect.com/pregnancy/ ... ve-system/

Or here https://www.babycenter.com/pregnancy/he ... x_20004784

This is normally done by looking for common male/female features at a certain age with things like Ultra sound. So this is not tested, on things in the blood or other measures. Therefore we have no really way to say the sex until this time.

However this does not answer the question, is the sex on a child male or female at contraception, I cannot find anything to support it or not.

I want to find an example were eg unfortunately a women dies in a car car crash, they tested the fetus for something and could see the sex of the 3 weeks old fetus from blood or something else in the body of the fetus.

Given all of this, and without any other information, you should not give a fetus any sex assignment, until you really can see whats developing inside the woman.

This is like the question pregnant women always get asked, will it be a boy or a girl, and its just to early to know before 6 to 11 weeks, as nobody would suggest surgery to find it out.

Until we get a test for this, the fetus sex, it "IT", until time passes and we can tell it.

We may never know at what stage of the process the sex is defined, either at contraception of another process after wards.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:46 pm
by Franklan
Given all of this, and without any other information, you should not give a fetus any sex assignment, until you really can see whats developing inside the woman.
A long time ago, I helped a he/she/it who had a flat tire on the car.

I joked by saying "You're lucky, the tire is only flat on the lower part, not on the upper part, it could be worse."

He/she/it looked at me with a 1000y stare, not understanding.

Conclusion: If you're talking to idiots, does it matter if it is a he/she/it/x?

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:01 pm
by snowingagain
Sex selection for IVF, is now pretty much 100 percent accurate. It is obviously useful for couples trying to avoid dreadful sex linked inherited disease, but also now being used commonly for people wanting a boy or a girl, whatever. But they can do it. These are really young embryos. You know, XX or XY. Sex is determined at conception.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:27 pm
by Eric7
Fraufruit wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:57 pm This is amusing - https://us.yahoo.com/news/trump-starts- ... 57952.html
It's going to be a rocky 4 years... if we make it that far! :lol:

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:17 pm
by yesterday
snowingagain wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:01 pm Sex selection for IVF, is now pretty much 100 percent accurate. It is obviously useful for couples trying to avoid dreadful sex linked inherited disease, but also now being used commonly for people wanting a boy or a girl, whatever. But they can do it. These are really young embryos. You know, XX or XY. Sex is determined at conception.
I tend to think so as well.

If a woman goes to a doctor and says am I pregnant, the doctor can answer yes or no after a couple of weeks following sex
If a woman goes to a doctor and says will it be a boy or girl, the doctor will not know, because in the early weeks there is no test that can show this.

But I still think its determined on the night of conception, its just we do not have a way to prove it yet, but I could be wrong.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:35 pm
by Fraufruit
What about day sex?

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:40 am
by Alberto
Fraufruit wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:35 pm What about day sex?
Not bad either.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:45 am
by Alberto
warsteiner70 wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:27 pm "The aide did not mention whether the president would ban trans men from participating in women’s sports, too, but Trump did say at a pre-inaugural rally Sunday that he would take action to “keep all men out of women’s sports.”"
Trump has done a lot of damage and will do even more.
I would not have voted him.
But this, no men in women's sport, is actually a good thing.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:48 am
by Franklan
Fraufruit wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:35 pm What about day sex?
I am more concerned about the Orange dude having access to "weapons of mass destruction" rather than his interpretation what "weapons of mass conception" can achieve on a daily basis.

Let me also point out that he uses male/female/mexicans to diferentiate people regularly.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:29 am
by Krieg
He thinks the S in BRICS is Spain.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:56 am
by Alberto
Krieg wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:29 am He thinks the S in BRICS is Spain.
I dislike Trump as much as any decent person does, because he's already caused much harm and is going to do more.
But he's not stupid.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:57 am
by Alberto
Franklan wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:48 amhe uses male/female/mexicans to diferentiate people regularly.
Does it mean people can be EITHER male OR female OR Mexicans???

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:07 am
by Eric7
Alberto wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:56 am
Krieg wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:29 am He thinks the S in BRICS is Spain.
I dislike Trump as much as any decent person does, because he's already caused much harm and is going to do more.
But he's not stupid.
He did say that though... and then smugly suggested the reporter should look into BRICS.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:09 am
by Krieg
Alberto wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:56 am
Krieg wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:29 am He thinks the S in BRICS is Spain.
I dislike Trump as much as any decent person does, because he's already caused much harm and is going to do more.
But he's not stupid.
It is not about being stupid, it is about not doing his job. AFAIK it is his job to understand international politics when you want to be the world's police.

Re: The Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 12:01 pm
by yesterday
TRUMP saying "Donald Trump says attacks on police officers in January 6 riots were 'minor incidents'"
https://news.sky.com/story/donald-trump ... s-13294683


but but but but

Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6 ... 20officers.

To see what really happend
"Within 36 hours, five people died: one was shot by the Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, and three died of natural causes, including a police officer who died of natural causes a day after being assaulted by rioters.[d][35][46] Many people were injured, including 174 police officers"
and a planted pipe bomb